Ask A Question

Subscribe You’re not receiving notifications from this thread.

Two Sum (Main Thread)

Here is the interview question prompt, presented for reference.

This is a classic and very common interview problem. Given an array of integers, return the indices of the two numbers in it that add up to a specific goal number.

So let's say our 'goal' number was 10. Our numbers to sum to it would be 3 and 7, and we would return an array of indices 1 and 3 respectively.

js let arr = [1, 3, 6, 7, 9]; let goal = 10; twoSum(arr, goal); // [1, 3]

You may assume that each input would have exactly one solution. Additionally, you may not use the same element twice towards the sum. This means if given [1, 3] and a goal of 2, you cannot use 1 twice and return its index twice as [0, 0].

Here's the function signature to fill in:

js function twoSum(arr, goal) { return arr; }

AlgoDaily partner has kindly provided a guide on solving Two Sum in Go. Check it out for even deeper coverage of this problem.

You can see the full challenge with visuals at this link.

Challenges • Asked over 1 year ago by Noobert

Jake from AlgoDaily Commented on Jul 29, 2019:

This is the main discussion thread generated for Two Sum.

Noobert Commented on Jul 29, 2019:

function twoSum(arr, goal) {

let results = [];

for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++){

if (arr.indexOf(goal - arr[i]) > 0){

results.push(i, arr.indexOf(goal - arr[i]));




return results;


Vishnu Lucky Commented on Dec 14, 2019:

private static int[] getIndices(int[] a, int k) {

HashMap map = new HashMap<>();
for(int i=0;i<a.length;i++) {
map.put(a[i], i);

for(int i=0;i<a.length;i++) {
if(map.containsKey(k-a[i])) {
return new int[] {i,map.get(k-a[i])};

return new int[] {-1,-1};


kcoddington Commented on Sep 17, 2020:

The following solution shows being faster than the provided solution on

function twoSum(arr, goal) {
  const results = [];
  const hashmap = {};
  for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
    hashmap[arr[i]] = i;
    const mate = goal - arr[i];
    if (hashmap[mate] != null) {
  return results;
TimWong17 Commented on Jan 17, 2021:

Is there a difference in using the Two Pointer approach versus a Hash Map for this problem? I was initially using the Two Pointer approach to solve this. I believe there time complexities are both O(n). Just not too sure which approach would be best in an interview setting.

Jake from AlgoDaily Commented on Jan 19, 2021:

Hi Tim,

Both approaches work well! The hash map takes O(n) more space (since it needs to store each input element in the array as keys), so complexity-wise Two Pointers are better (O(1) space).