Conclusion

In summary, monorepos and polyrepos represent two contrasting approaches to managing codebases. Monorepos centralize all projects into one repository while polyrepos decentralize code into many independent repos.

There is no objectively superior choice between the two models. The best approach depends on the specific needs and circumstances of a project. Factors like team structure, number of services, and release velocity should be considered.

For small teams and codebases, a monorepo may work well. But larger organizations with many discrete projects might lean towards polyrepos. Frequent releases favor polyrepos, while teams that value atomic changes prefer monorepos.

Neither monolithic or distributed repositories are inherently "right" or "wrong". Both architectures have advantages and disadvantages that suit them to particular scenarios. By evaluating their own requirements, development teams can determine whether a monorepo or polyrepo strategy is a better organizational fit.